EDUCATION
Oct 2, 2018
Subscribe
Author: Charlie Dunlap, Chairman & Co-Founder
Download PDF
Events such as a downturn in the economy, a dispute among partners, or cash flow problems caused by new market competition, can affect the viability of an income property loan. These real estate loans may need a “workout” by the lender so that the borrower doesn’t lose its property. During the loan workout phase, it is critical that the borrower keep in full, open communication with the lender about their cash flow situation and plans to avoid a monetary default. When a lender is dealing with a responsible, honest borrower, the lender is more likely to work with the borrower to help them get through a rough period.
With that being said, even if no actual monetary default has occurred, there are a number of events that could precipitate the need for the appointment of an independent receiver. Some examples of these events are:
In any situation in which the property or the rights of parties need protection, a receivership is appropriate. For example, if two owners of the collateral property sue each other, and the lender believes that the collateral assets are at risk of being depleted, there is usually no choice but to put the asset in a receiver’s hands. At the resolution of litigation, the court can decide the proper disposition of the receivership assets.
Even if there is not ongoing litigation, a neutral, third-party receiver may be necessary in cases of internal disagreements between stakeholders. Borrowers' internal stakeholder conflicts often cause delays, but generally the lender will not tolerate a borrower’s internal disputes to slow down the workout process. The notice of intent to appoint a receiver is sometimes enough to encourage the borrower’s stakeholders to cooperate in the loan workout process. If not, the appointment of a neutral, third-party receiver may be necessary.
A borrower acting in good faith will respond quickly to a lender’s request for information. If during a loan workout attempt, the borrower becomes uncooperative or unresponsive, failing to reply in a timely manner or not at all, then it may be necessary that a receiver be put in place.
For example, “slow-walking” an answer to a lender’s request is often viewed as a delay tactic to give the borrower extra time to collect and stash away additional rental or business income. In order to avoid this potential situation, a lender will need a receiver to be put in control of all collateral as quickly as possible.
When the lender is not receiving reliable financial information that it is entitled to receive from the borrower, it will become necessary to obtain the correct information using a neutral, third-party source.
The lender may request that a “limited receiver” be appointed, who is capable of providing reliable financial information requested by the lender. Such a “limited receiver” would have experience in the specific industry and understand the industry accounting and customs.
There are occasions when a borrower becomes overly emotional and sometimes combative. At this point, the lender will find that very little constructive movement can be achieved by continuing to negotiate with the borrower. In order to remove emotion, it is oftentimes best to insert a neutral, third-party receiver.
The neutral, third-party relationship provided by a receiver, and overseen by a judge, removes most emotion from borrower-lender dealings and allows a judge to rule on any contentious issues.
A lender does not have the right to enter a borrower's property without first obtaining permission from the borrower. In a situation where a difficult borrower is not willing to grant access, a decision by the lender to appoint a receiver to gain access to the collateral property will resolve the matter one way or another. Access will be granted by either the borrower or by the appointed receiver.
If during a loan workout attempt, the lender believes that he can no longer trust the borrower to negotiate in good faith, or the borrower has been found to be untrustworthy based upon previous borrower misrepresentations, the appointment of a receiver will enable the lender to find out exactly what is going on with the collateral in question.
If it is clear to the lender that the terms of the loan agreement have been broken, the threat of a receiver being appointed may be enough to encourage a borrower to correct the situation. If not, then the appointment of an independent, third-party receiver is the prudent next step to correct the situation.
A receiver experienced in the specific industry will best understand the industry customs, “prudent person rules” and standard of care. The receivership's purpose will not be to interfere with management direction but simply to verify facts. Such a receiver will provide a neutral, third-party analysis of not only the books and records, but also the appropriateness of each expenditure.
Again, it bears reiterating that frequently a receiver is thought of as a “last resort” once other solutions have failed. This is a widespread misconception, as significant value can be preserved, costs avoided, and time saved if a receiver is appointed earlier in the process. If any of the above red flags become apparent, consider the benefits that a receiver may confer before the situation spirals out of control.
Should you have any questions related to receiverships, please email info@rracapital.com.
Sign up for our email newsletter to receive industry insights, updates and more.
*By signing up, you are also agreeing to our use of email tracking technology that collects information about your interaction with our email alerts.